The Indian Express, Thursday August 22, 2019. After discussions with officials of Yerawada Central Prison, the Koregaon Bhima Commission of Inquiry on Wednesday decided to examine two accused in the Elgaar Parishad case, Sudhir Dhawale and lawyer Surendra Gadling, in the same courtroom at the premises of the old Zilla Parishad where the hearings are currently underway. Read more
Mridula Chari’s piece in The Scroll brings to light the struggles to obtain legally due facilities for prisoners in Yeravada jail. Bhima Koregaon arrestees – Varavara Rao (not given a mattress), Shoma Sen (not given a commode for her arthritis), and Surendra Gadling (not given books he wants as a lawyer representing himself). Read more
The Supreme Court today set aside the Bombay High Court’s order that had refused the extension of time for completion of investigation against Surendra Gadling and other activists in relation to the Bhima Koregaon violence…This effectively means that the five activists -Surendra Gadling, Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, Mahesh Raut
While there are many lapses, the malafide intentions of the police machinery at the behest of their political masters are writ large. Justice D Y Chandrachud was not at all mistaken to call Maharashtra police “untrustworthy” in this landmark dissenting judgment in the Bhima-Koregaon case. read more…
Surendra Gadling was targeted because he won too many acquittals, say his defenders. Nov 6th, 2018
New Delhi — Surendra Gadling was produced at 5 am in the morning in a district courtroom in Pune last week; his family was unaware of his whereabouts. His court-appointed lawyer was shaken out of bed at 4:30 am and appeared before the court with no prior information on the case.
Gadling’s own legal representatives were denied access to him by the court, as their names were not on the vakalat-nama, and soon he was remanded to 8 days of police custody.
“Advocate Gadling was not given an opportunity to present a proper defence,” said Sidhartha Patil, who is part of Gadling’s legal team. “There was no reason to grant police custody as the search and seizure of his house is complete.” Police custody — unlike judicial custody — Patil noted, meant Gadling could not apply for bail.
The arrest and subsequent treatment of well-known human rights lawyer Surendra Gadling has shaken human rights defenders, members of the legal fraternity, and political activists who see a conspiracy to silence a lawyer with a history of fighting politically-charged cases. Gadling’s arrest, they say, is the latest front in the ruling Bharatiya Janta Party’s attempts to quell all political dissent. Read more…
Who is Surendra Gadling?
Surendra Gadling is a human rights lawyer and General Secretary of the Indian Association of Peoples’ Lawyers (IAPL). Among those he has represented are numerous human rights defenders arrested on fabricated charges of being anti-national.
As the Indian Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL) notes about the recent arrest of Surendra Gadling (and many others):
“Advocate Surendra Gadling is an iconic example to many
Gadling began as an apprentice in the railways soon after finishing college in the 1980s. He actively participated in many socio-cultural movements in Nagpur. He along with his friends- Sambhaji Bhagat, an activist, a people’s poet and balladeer, and Vilas Ghogre, also a prominent poet and activist from Mumbai who committed suicide to protest the 1997 Ramabai killings of Dalits– started an organisation called Awhan Natya Manch. This group would organise cultural evenings in the bastis of Nagpur and engage in conversations around rights and oppressions.
Gadling began his career almost two decades ago in Nagpur fighting cases of those arrested under the draconian TADA (Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985), and UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967).
In addition to his work as a lawyer, Gadling is also a leading Dalit rights activist. He was part of an independent fact-finding team that probed the ‘encounter’ deaths of 40 alleged Maoists killed by the police in Gadchiroli district in April. Last month, Gadling was also part of a team that visited Kashmir to condemn the persecution of human rights lawyers in the state.
In his nearly two-and-a-half decade long legal practice in Nagpur and other districts in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, Surendra Gadling has handled thousands of cases. He is known to have mastered stringent laws like TADA, POTA and later UAPA. “Almost all cases filed under these laws have been handled by him over last two decades. In them, barring only three cases, he managed to get acquittal in all others,” says his junior partner Nihalsingh Rathod.
As Arun Ferreira, who himself was represented by Gadling when he was arrested and jailed for five years in 2007 for alleged Maoist activities and then acquitted after spending 40 months in jail reflects, “Gadling has become a thorn for the state government because in his entire career, he has managed to get a lot of acquittals for political prisoners who were falsely charged with Naxalism and other crimes.” [link]
He also worked as a special public prosecutor on dowry-related cases and was one of the leading lawyers in connection with the Khairlanji agitation – a protest movement launched after the gruesome caste-murders of a Dalit family in Maharashtra.
He is also a lawyer for Prof. G.N. Saibaba, a wheelchair-bound Delhi University professor sentenced to life imprisonment by a district court in Gadchiroli for aiding the Maoists. Prof. Saibaba is appealing the verdict.
Saibaba’s conviction has not just proved to be a major jolt to the human rights movement, as the rights defenders have argued in past year, it also landed Gadling in a vulnerable situation. Describing those several instances where he was “targeted” by the state, Gadling told the court that veiled and unveiled threats intensified after he decided to take up Saibaba’s case. “The police officers investigating the case would casually tell me I was next in the line. They even went to the extent of planting false allegations in the media. This was happening when I was appearing as a profession lawyer in the court,” Gadling explained.He also claimed that in at least five to six instances, the police, especially those in Gadchiroli and Nagpur have tried to implicate him in false cases. “They would claim I am a wanted/ accused person even when I was appearing before them. But they never arrested me. This was only to break my morale. I have worked in the face of severe threats to my life and damage to my professional credibility. It has not been easy,” he added.